Mientras Vacilando

Entries from September 2008

The American Tradition of Hope

September 26, 2008 · 5 Comments

I can’t remember the show, but I remember a conversation I once witnessed on television between a Russian woman and an American man. The Russian woman was explaining that the difference between Americans and the rest of the world is that Americans expect things to go well and are distraught when they don’t while nearly everyone else expects things to go poorly and are pleased when they in fact go well. At first glance I probably thought that this statement, although in my experience true, was pretty simplistic logic. But for some reason the quote stuck somewhere in the back of my head and kept popping up during this recent gloom and doom. 

When I began to really think about this statement, I started to feel like this difference in outlook plays a fundamental role in the world. I mean this is effectively the foundation of how any individual behaves in society. It is essentially the old glass half full half empty question. As human beings, all of our actions are products of what the expected outcome is. We don’t jump out of moving cars because we expect to be hurt. We routinely fall in love expecting to not get hurt. We cheat, lie, or steal solely based on what expectations we have of being caught – a person who cannot be caught far more likely to cheat than one who knows they will. 

If we can all agree that this is basic human behavior and that it transcends national and ethnic lines, than surely it is the difference of expectations that we all have that determine the difference in our actions. And if the aforementioned character is correct, where had American’s hope or optimism gotten us today? Where would we be if we expected bad things like this recent financial crisis to happen. We put money in our banks expecting it to be protected. We invested in companies we knew would always be there. What if we had been like citizens of other countries and hid our cash in the walls? Or expected the housing bubble to burst and corrected it on our own? 

In no way am I trying to imply that one outlook is better than another, I am just intrigued by the difference and by the fact that something as seemingly simple as general optimism can have such a profound effect on something as complex as financial structures. Where does this optimism come from? Is it a product of our legendary and historical growth from a newborn country to the world’s superpower in 150 short years? Or is it this recent success that has tricked us into thinking the cards will always fall in our favor? Success can often be a dangerous poison. 

Lastly, will the recent events of the world – the financial crisis, war, environmental damages, terrorist attacks – change our collective perspective? Will it take us from a optimistic nation to a pragmatic one? Is the pre-emptive war in Iraq a sign that this shift was already under way? I am interested to know what people think? Has our optimism made our country great or has it been our eventual downfall? Has expecting the best made us soft and vulnerable and would expecting the worst make us aggressive and dangerous?

The persona of America is an aggregate of the various perspectives, viewpoints, beliefs, and actions of its’ citizens and I think it is both scary and refreshing to be reminded of the power of thought and belief. Dark days surely lie ahead, and a whole generation of Americans will now begin to grow old in a world where America’s foundation has been weakened. As things begin to change, and world events begin to unfold, I am curious to watch the development of our nation’s expectations. And as a matter of coincidence, I find it interesting that at least one presidential candidate continues to run on hope. It will be interesting to see how voters respond to that promise.

Categories: Politics · Society At Large

The Issue of Legacy

September 25, 2008 · 1 Comment

I never really intended on getting political here in this blog. We are all inundated with political news everyday and especially in an election time I think it is fair to say that the last thing anyone wants to do is listen to one more opinion. But this is really meant to be less than a political blog then it is a historical one. I will do my best to stick to the facts and leave partisanship out of it. If I fall short of that I welcome constructive criticism.

As any presidential administration winds down, the lame duck often begins to switch focus from foreign policy to their legacy. This means long-winded speeches, book deals, and of course designs of their own Presidential Library. So as we approach the end of this particular administration, I got to wondering just how will W. be remembered?

Supporters (there are a few left) have long claimed that eventually history would be kind to him and that the war in Iraq would eventually be looked at as a courageous step to spread democracy to the Middle East. Few supporters would go as far as to say that he will be remembered as the best president in our history, but instead somewhere in the middle, perhaps as simply misunderstood during his time.

Critics, on the other hand, have often declared that he will go down as the worst president of all time, which is no small feat when you consider some of the men who have graced the Oval Office. For years I have sort of viewed this claim to be purely political, that it was yet another example of sweeping generalizations that both D’s and R’s make against one another. But taking into account that a President is ultimately responsible for nearly everything that happens in their term – whether it is directly their fault or not – I have to ask if this claim has some validity. A quick review:

1. 9/11 – No matter who may or may not have had the option to take out Bin Laden, it still happened on is watch.

2. War in Afghanistan – Right idea, but the whole purpose was to apply pressure to catch OBL. Never happened.

3. War in Iraq – Certainly one of the least effective and popular wars in history. Hugely responsible for the financial mess we are in now as it is a major function of our exorbitant oil prices.

4. Torture/Abu Ghirab scandal – I think this is where we lost a lot of respect from the rest of the world. 

5. Patriot Act – While there is plenty of debate over this, what can’t be debated is that the fundamental prinicples of this act undermine our Constitution and the very freedoms we are supposedly fighting for.

5. Hurricane Katrina – Natural disasters happen. Complete bungling of the rescue operations does not have to. 

6. The current Financial Crisis – Again, although there are many causes to this, it still happened on his watch.

When you look at this list of major problems/incidents/scandals etc. that have made up his administration it is (sadly) impressive. Take the politics out and just focus on the fact that the buck has to stop somewhere. A president cannot just get good credit - ie Clinton and the economy which had nothing to do with him – they have to accept blame for the bad stuff too. That is why it is the hardest job in the planet and why most smart people would never even consider running.

So what do you all think? Where will his presidency rank? Will he eventually redeem himself and if so how? Or will all of these things be too large to ignore and will he have to be considered the worst. Or, as John Oliver from the Daily Show suggested, is there enough time left for his legacy to be the Last President?

Categories: History · Politics